| |||||||
Monday, June 25, 2012
For World Travelers and Wannabes :)
Monday, June 18, 2012
Celebrities in Higher Education
In May, economist Walter Williams gave the commencement address to six hundred some Grove City graduates. Their families and friends came with great expectations to hear a compelling charge and inspiring message. In 2011, Laura Bush, former first lady, came to speak. She has far more name recognition than Walter Williams. So the 2012 graduates were somewhat biased against Williams, on the grounds that he is not important enough.
On graduation day, many graduates were quite disappointed. The title of the talk is "Morality and Capitalism". They accused the speech of being a dense economics lecture. They wanted something relevant to their lives and applicable to the end of their time at Grove City. Students berated Williams merely because the speech had content. It seems they only wanted fluff and feel-good material. Having read a transcript of the speech, I agree that it is packed with substance. It is an economics lesson, full of relevant examples and descriptive explanations. The address was not designed to be empowering or inspirational. Rather it was delivered as a lecture, to educate the students.
I am ashamed of the quality of the graduates, in their responses to the speech. They admitted to nodding off through the middle and being bored and uninterested. If they cannot give their attention for a single lecture, then I have little hope they earned an education at Grove City. If they are so unaccustomed to listening to lectures, then what have they learned in class? The skills of perusing Facebook without the professor noticing?
Secondly, these students have bought the party line, that education is entertainment. Neil Postman wrote Amusing Ourselves to Death, in which he demonstrates that the televization of education has robbed students of learning. They are accustomed to being entertained, even in the History Channel. History Channel editors know that they can quickly lose their viewers to more entertaining shows, so they make their "lessons" as dramatic and engaging as possible. Students now expect education to entertain. The idea of a dense or substantive lecture bores them. The thought of a speaker without fame and honor is abhorring.
I venture to guess that they would have preferred a celebrity to Walter Williams. A light, inspiring talk by a pop culture icon would be "more fun" than economics. And this, dear friends, is the sad state of education and society in the United States today.
To see the speech for yourself: http://www.gcc.edu/2012_Commencement_Address.php
On graduation day, many graduates were quite disappointed. The title of the talk is "Morality and Capitalism". They accused the speech of being a dense economics lecture. They wanted something relevant to their lives and applicable to the end of their time at Grove City. Students berated Williams merely because the speech had content. It seems they only wanted fluff and feel-good material. Having read a transcript of the speech, I agree that it is packed with substance. It is an economics lesson, full of relevant examples and descriptive explanations. The address was not designed to be empowering or inspirational. Rather it was delivered as a lecture, to educate the students.
I am ashamed of the quality of the graduates, in their responses to the speech. They admitted to nodding off through the middle and being bored and uninterested. If they cannot give their attention for a single lecture, then I have little hope they earned an education at Grove City. If they are so unaccustomed to listening to lectures, then what have they learned in class? The skills of perusing Facebook without the professor noticing?
Secondly, these students have bought the party line, that education is entertainment. Neil Postman wrote Amusing Ourselves to Death, in which he demonstrates that the televization of education has robbed students of learning. They are accustomed to being entertained, even in the History Channel. History Channel editors know that they can quickly lose their viewers to more entertaining shows, so they make their "lessons" as dramatic and engaging as possible. Students now expect education to entertain. The idea of a dense or substantive lecture bores them. The thought of a speaker without fame and honor is abhorring.
I venture to guess that they would have preferred a celebrity to Walter Williams. A light, inspiring talk by a pop culture icon would be "more fun" than economics. And this, dear friends, is the sad state of education and society in the United States today.
To see the speech for yourself: http://www.gcc.edu/2012_Commencement_Address.php
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Wanted: Creativity in the Workplace
Students are wiser than high paying
corporations. The office hours of 9am to 5pm fail to account for what
is best for human productivity. Sitting at a desk for eight or more
hours in a day saps energy and hinders effective task completion.
Students complete their work at all
hours of the night and day. They maximize their most productive hours
and capitalize on high motivation levels. Without pressures of
deadlines or other constraints, motivation wanes and students
procrastinate. Why should employees be any different?
Requiring a certain set of hours is
less effective than assigning tasks and deadlines. Imagine if
professors required a log of X hours spent in the library researching
a topic. This incentivizes low productivity and no output. Athletes
in study hall have the incentive to waste the time.
A task-oriented business world
recognizes the basic human desires and incentives. High-performing
employees are rewarded with an early end to the day. Low-performers
are penalized by having to work more hours to complete same tasks.
Yet their inefficiency only would hurt themselves, not their
employers.
The human body is not made to work long
periods of work, such as eight or more hours in the same location
behind the same desk at the same computer. Efficiency is increased
with regular and punctuated breaks. They provide a chance for the
worker to rest his brain and stretch his body. The 9am to 5pm
tradition must be made passe.
Think of an office at Friday,
mid-afternoon, when people start counting down until they can leave.
Those last few hours rapidly diminish in productivity. Everyone knows
that the office is closing soon, but most are required to stay until
the end of the day. Their incentives to stay focused have already
left for the weekend. The business loses out on their time.
Offices tend to stifle creativity. The
same professional (read: boring) setting, the same computer screens
and the same environment hinders innovation. Artists of all types
seek imaginative environments that stimulate creative ideas.
Businesses desire innovation and creativity, but most workplaces are
designed in a one-size-fits-all manner.
The Google offices have implemented
these ideas by providing Legos, Buckyballs, Rubik's cubes, recreation
areas, and colorful walls, chairs and bean bags. They recognize the
correlation between imaginative environments and increased
creativity. Plus it makes for a happier and friendlier office space.
Students naturally seek work locations
that best fit their needs. Some have a favorite desk at the library;
others go to a different part of the library every time. Some work at
a desk; others in a large, comfy chair. Some prefer to work in a cafe
or the student union; others seek a solitary location. They are
productive in different settings.
Creativity makes the world go round.
It's time for the business world to allow people the freedom to work
at their own pace and let their creative ideas flourish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)